Book a meeting
Home/Resources/Clinical publications
Clinical publications

Tested against real-world complexity.

Multicenter, multivendor, real-world. Our CINA tools are evaluated across hospitals and teleradiology networks in the US and Europe, dozens of scanner models and everyday clinical conditions. Every figure on this site traces back to its study.

37Studies listed
9CINA tools covered
US · EUPeer-reviewed and congress
Validated performance

Every figure, traced to its study.

Every peer-reviewed and conference-presented study behind CINA, grouped by tool: the accuracy and clinical-impact figures each one reports, and a link to the paper. Filter by tool to see only the evidence that applies to you.

CINA-ICH

8 publicationsSee the tool →
STUDY AND COHORTSENS.SPEC.CLINICAL IMPACT

Validation of a Deep Learning Tool in the Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Large Vessel Occlusion

McLouth et al., Frontiers in Neurology, 2021 · n=814 · multicenter US, 44 states
91.4%97.5%

Automated Identification of Intracranial Hemorrhage by Artificial Intelligence Improves Report Turnaround Time in Real Clinical Practice

Ayobi et al., ESNR, 2024 · Real-world teleradiology deployment
––
Report turnaround time146.8 → 88.8 min−39%

Assessment of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage

Rava et al., World Neurosurgery, 2021 · Cohort not stated
93%–

Refining Deep Learning Application Diagnostic Accuracy in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)

Tassy et al., Stroke, 2025 · Cohort not stated
89%94%

Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Tool for Multi-Step Acute Stroke Imaging: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study

Agripnidis et al., European Journal of Radiology, 2025 · Cohort not stated
86%98%

Real-world impact of an AI-driven teleradiology workflow for intracranial hemorrhage detection: Reducing diagnostic delays across a multicenter emergency network

Bani-Sadr et al., Neuroscience Informatics, 2026 · Multicenter emergency network
97%96%
Report turnaround time−26 minPatient turnaround time−14 min

Performance of an AI-Based Automated Identification of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in Clinical Routine

El Ahmadi et al., ECR, 2024 · Clinical routine
––
Accuracy (Se/Sp not reported)93%

Artificial Intelligence and Acute Stroke Imaging - A Comprehensive Review

Soun et al., AJNR, 2021 (review · no headline figure
––

CINA-LVO

8 publicationsSee the tool →
STUDY AND COHORTSENS.SPEC.CLINICAL IMPACT

Validation of a Deep Learning Tool in the Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Large Vessel Occlusion

McLouth et al., Frontiers in Neurology, 2021 · n=378 CTA · multicenter US
98.1%98.2%

Automated Large Vessel Occlusions Detection: Improved Diagnostic Accuracy in MCA M2 Segment Using Deep Learning

Franciosini et al., Stroke, 2025 · n=557 · incl. M2 segment
93.8%[90.2–96.3]91.2%[87.3–94.2]

Duration and Accuracy of Automated Stroke CT Workflow with AI-Supported Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion Detection

Temmen et al., Scientific Reports, 2023 · Automated stroke CT workflow
––
Radiologist reading time395 → 60 sec−85%

Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Driven Large Vessel Occlusion Detection Algorithm for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Rava et al., Neuroradiology Journal, 2021 · Cohort not stated
73%98%

Head-to-Head Comparison of Commercial Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Detection of Large Vessel Occlusion

Schlossman et al., Frontiers in Neurology, 2022 · Head-to-head comparison
76%98%

Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Tool for Multi-Step Acute Stroke Imaging: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study

Agripnidis et al., European Journal of Radiology, 2025 · Cohort not stated
55%97%

Performance of an AI-Based Automated Identification of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in Clinical Routine

El Ahmadi et al., ECR, 2024 · Clinical routine
––
Accuracy (Se/Sp not reported)86%

Artificial Intelligence and Acute Stroke Imaging - A Comprehensive Review

Soun et al., AJNR, 2021 (review · no headline figure
––

CINA-PE

8 publicationsSee the tool →
STUDY AND COHORTSENS.SPEC.CLINICAL IMPACT

Performance and clinical utility of an artificial intelligence-enabled tool for pulmonary embolism detection

Ayobi et al., Clinical Imaging, 2024 · n=1,204 CTPA
93.9%[89.3–96.9]94.8%[93.3–96.1]
Missed-diagnosis rate15.6% → 3.8%76% recovered

Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for Automatic Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in Chest CT Angiograms

Grenier et al., Diagnostics, 2023 · n=387 · multicenter
91.4%[86.4–95.0]91.5%[86.8–95.0]

Shorter Time to Assessment and Anticoagulation with Decreased Mortality in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism Following Implementation of AI Software

Shapiro et al., JVS Venous, 2024 · Tertiary referral center, pre/post AI
––
Scan-to-alert time318 → 5.47 min−98%In-hospital mortality8.4% → 2.2%−74%

Validation of a Deep Learning Tool for Automatic Pulmonary Embolism Detection

Schlossman et al., ATS, 2023 · Cohort not stated
91%92%

Deep Learning-based Automated Detection of Pulmonary Embolism

Babacan et al., J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2026 · Cohort not stated
>81%>99%

Exploratory validation of an AI-based pulmonary embolism detection tool: Bridging technology and clinical practice

Nobushima et al., Int. J. Cardiology Innovations, 2026 · Cohort not stated
95%99%

A Deep Learning-Based Algorithm Improves Radiology Residents' Diagnoses of Acute PE on CT Pulmonary Angiograms

Vallée et al., European Journal of Radiology, 2024 · Radiology residents, reader study
––
Reader accuracy95% → 98%

The Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Detection and Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism at a Tertiary Referral Center

Shapiro et al., Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2023 · no headline figure
––
No study matches these filters.

Figures as reported by each study. Sens. = sensitivity, Spec. = specificity.

Get in touch

Let’s talk about your workflow.

Tell us about your challenges and clinical routine. We will show you which CINA tools fit, and how they plug into your PACS.

CT technologist next to a CT scanner, a colleague preparing a patient for the scan
Stay informed

Newsletter

Get the latest updates and insights from Avicenna.AI.

HubSpot formThe newsletter form loads here.